Our New Home

We have a new home, come join us at WeAreSMRT (We Are Skeptical Minds & Rational Thinkers)

The Forum

Friday, August 8, 2008

Is Ray Slipping?

Well, perhaps. I was astonished at Ray's Scientific Proof for Evolution post. No, not because of the "commentary" on PZ's appearance, that type of, erm, analysis was expected.

I was astonished at the last link in the post:

www.heathenz.com/2008/08/06/pz-myers-on-a-christian-radio-show/

heathenz.com... he links to an atheist blog, something I don't know if I've ever seen him do on his blog. An articulate, well spoken atheist at that... devoid of all that blaspheming profanity, which is characteristic of the atheist agenda. Does he know that Heathenz has the following posts?It doesn't seem very much in-line with Ray's first policy of censorship and second policy of usually only posting the worst of atheist responses to him.


7 comments:

  1. I was amazed at his commentary, although I guess I shouldn't have been.

    He scoffs at this evidence for evolution but what in his world view could possibly account for these changes in species?

    If you listen to his interview too, it becomes apparent how delusional this man really is - he has no idea how much doubletalk he spews.
    On the one hand he states that science cannot be trusted(to tell us dogs are colourblind) but then says that there's very important scientific evidence for Intelligent Design.

    So which is it Ray? Science either has the power to explain the world around us, or it doesn't. He can't have it both ways.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "He scoffs at this evidence for evolution but what in his world view could possibly account for these changes in species?"

    Microevolution. Genetic variations within "Kind." What he refuses to accept is that dogs will bear parrots and gravity will produce strawberries BY SHEER FORCE OF WILL.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ray's latest:

    "Patti...Ten minutes before the debate, the station called and said that the debate was off, and that it would just be me being interviewed. I wasn't given any explanation at all. It was strange."

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Patti...Ten minutes before the debate, the station called and said that the debate was off, and that it would just be me being interviewed. I wasn't given any explanation at all. It was strange."

    Why am I not buying that when PZ knew a day in advance?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm the author of Heathenz and did a complete double-take. I guess he either didn't know my blog was atheist-themed or he couldn't find anywhere else to download the audio of PZ's interview on WDAY. Either way, it's pretty funny.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Radno Said: "Why am I not buying that when PZ knew a day in advance?"

    Ray is proving himself to be more dishonest by the day. He was caught in a lie, so rather than admit it, he is retreating to this idiotic story, another lie.

    He is a lying weasel and nothing that he says on ANY topic should be trusted.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ray posted that shit (I do not mean the link, but the whole thing) because he was feeling some pressure to say something. To "save face." It seems like his followers (whether they like the term or not) took a while to say something, and when they did ... why would I be surprised? ... they just said something very stupid.

    I am not surprised at how tiny his post looks, how inconsequential, and lacking in any energy. He did not have even a bit of conviction. It shows he was not able to find anything that he could hang on from to "look smart."

    Poor things those fundies.

    G.E.

    ReplyDelete

Unlike Ray we don't censor our comments, so as long as it's on topic and not spam, fire away.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.