1) If person P has committed transgression X at least once in his life, then P is, without regard to temporality, one who performs X. (Proposed by Ray Comfort and stipulated for sole purpose of this argument)
2) Therefore, if Ray Comfort has lied at least once in his life, then Ray Comfort is a liar. (Instantiation of P and X from 1)
3) Ray Comfort has lied at least once in his life. (Implausibility of the contrary)
4) Therefore, Ray Comfort is a liar. (modus ponens from 2 and 3)
Not was a liar, is a liar. QED.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment
Unlike Ray we don't censor our comments, so as long as it's on topic and not spam, fire away.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.