Know Your Fallacies: Argumentum ad nauseam

Thought I'd shine a little light on a few fallacies from time to time and how they might apply to "he who must not be named" and his blog. I can't say how successful this will be, or if I will keep up with it, but why the hell not do it at least once?

The spotlight for this one is Argumentum ad nauseam, literally "argument to sickness".

A more specific definition from Wikipedia:

"An argument made repeatedly (possibly by different people) until nobody cares to discuss it anymore. This may sometimes, but not always, be a form of proof by assertion."

How does this apply to our friend? Almost all arguments he brings up fall under this fallacy. It involves parroting the same argument over and over again while one ignores the valid counter-arguments brought up against your own.

Long story short: "If something is repeated as true often enough, people will eventually come to accept it." - Joseph Goebbels

(P.S. I know Goebbels was a Nazi, that was the point of quoting him)