Ray and Kirk like to say that because cars, paintings, McDonalds, and gym shorts are made, we must be made too. They think that a painting or a car is 100% proof that there must be a creator who made them. Therefore, humans are 100% proof that we are created by something, i.e god. Basically if something is complicated or looks designed it MUST be designed. Well, not quite.
First of all this is a false analogy because paintings, cars, ect. are not naturally occurring, like humans and other life on earth. Secondly, there are examples of natural things here on earth that we know are not designed even though they may look designed. Take caves for example, intricate caves formed with complex stalagmites and stalactites occur through natural forces such as the dissolving of rock. Or take snowflakes for another example. They tend to look highly complex and are naturally occurring as they are formed by the aggregation of ice crystals under the right environmental conditions.
Therefore, for something to look designed god does not have to directly design it. For those who believe in god, If god makes intricate caves and snowflakes through natural forces would it not be plausible then for god to create humans and other creatures using natural forces? Like evolution, if this is where the scientific evidence takes us?